<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>imagiNATIVEamerica.com &#187; city square</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imaginativeamerica.com/tag/city-square/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imaginativeamerica.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Classifying Open Space: City Squares, Commons and Public Gardens</title>
		<link>http://www.imaginativeamerica.com/2009/01/classifying-open-space-city-squares-commons-and-public-gardens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imaginativeamerica.com/2009/01/classifying-open-space-city-squares-commons-and-public-gardens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks and open space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core to shore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[okc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oklahoma city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaginativeamerica.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is part 2/6 in a series overviewing The Normal Requirements of American Towns and Cities in Respect to Public Open Spaces, an article written by Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. and John Nolen that appeared in Charities and the Commons journal of social work in 1906. 
II. CITY SQUARES, COMMONS AND PUBLIC GARDENS

Pioneer Square in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is part 2/6 in a series overviewing <a href="http://imaginativeamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1906_charities_and_the_commons_park-movement.pdf" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/downloads/pdf/1906_charities_and_the_commons_park-movement.pdf');">The Normal Requirements of American Towns and Cities in Respect to Public Open Spaces</a>, an article written by Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. and John Nolen that appeared in <em>Charities and the Commons</em> journal of social work in 1906. </em></p>
<p><strong>II. CITY SQUARES, COMMONS AND PUBLIC GARDENS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://imaginativeamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/imagi_pioneer_square.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-322" title="imagi_pioneer_square" src="http://imaginativeamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/imagi_pioneer_square-640x308.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="308" /></a></p>
<h6>Pioneer Square in Portland, Oregon is a great example of an urban city square.</h6>
<blockquote><p>An opinion prevails very generally that a city can not have too many &#8220;squares&#8221; or &#8220;breathing places&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>On account of the almost constant passing through such squares the best arrangement is to provide for reasonably direct and convenient paths along the lines most used. Where this is not done many of those who use the square are likely to be so irritated by the indirectness as to miss much of the pleasure they might otherwise receive.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Shade trees, either as a complete grove or in rows along the paths or grouped in some more complex plan, are almost essential features of such squares.</p></blockquote>
<p>City Squares are certainly prevalent in many older cities, though they seem to be noticeably absent in Oklahoma City; especially downtown.</p>
<p><a href="http://imaginativeamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/imagi_bicentennial_park.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-331" title="imagi_bicentennial_park" src="http://imaginativeamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/imagi_bicentennial_park-640x248.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="248" /></a></p>
<h6>The properties adjacent to Bicentennial Park have not attracted the development necessary to integrate this open space into the urban fabric of Oklahoma City.</h6>
<p>There are a few that I can think of, most notably Bicentennial Park (or Civic Center Park) which is mostly underutilized, but has found footing as the site of the <em>Downtown in December</em> ice-skating rink.  Still, its proximity to the county jail has stymied development in the area and prevented it from being integrated into the broader fabric of downtown.  Also, the Myriad Gardens would qualify as a public garden, but the flawed design and poorly related adjacent uses have to this point prevented it from being a effectively utilized by the public.  This may all change with the completion of <a href="http://imaginativeamerica.com/tag/devon/">Devon Tower</a> and more development to the south of the park as Core to Shore begins to be developed out.</p>
<p>The Core to Shore plan will also contribute to the urban open space with the addition of a downtown park.  This will provide a much needed <a href="http://imaginativeamerica.com/2008/08/ten-must-haves-for-okcs-downtown-park/" target="_self">&#8220;central park&#8221;</a>, but the city still needs a truly urban open space, such as that provided to Portland by Pioneer Square, which is referred to as the &#8220;City&#8217;s Living Room&#8221;.  In the end, even if all of the plans for Core to Shore are fully realized, Oklahoma City will continue to lack quality urban open spaces &#8211; like Pioneer Square &#8211; that are effectively integrated into the fabric of the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imaginativeamerica.com/2009/01/classifying-open-space-city-squares-commons-and-public-gardens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

